Customize Consent Preferences

We use cookies to help you navigate efficiently and perform certain functions. You will find detailed information about all cookies under each consent category below.

The cookies that are categorized as "Necessary" are stored on your browser as they are essential for enabling the basic functionalities of the site. ... 

Always Active

Necessary cookies are required to enable the basic features of this site, such as providing secure log-in or adjusting your consent preferences. These cookies do not store any personally identifiable data.

No cookies to display.

Functional cookies help perform certain functionalities like sharing the content of the website on social media platforms, collecting feedback, and other third-party features.

No cookies to display.

Analytical cookies are used to understand how visitors interact with the website. These cookies help provide information on metrics such as the number of visitors, bounce rate, traffic source, etc.

No cookies to display.

Performance cookies are used to understand and analyze the key performance indexes of the website which helps in delivering a better user experience for the visitors.

No cookies to display.

Advertisement cookies are used to provide visitors with customized advertisements based on the pages you visited previously and to analyze the effectiveness of the ad campaigns.

No cookies to display.

Serious questions have to be asked! In today’s world, due diligence around people, organisations and what they have previously said, are the norm, to ensure that extremists have no platform or legitimisation in the eyes of the public. Yet, on October 18th in Committee Room 12, Bob Blackman hosted Tapan Ghosh, a well-known anti-Muslim extremist in the mother of democratic structures.

How Bob Blackman hosted and thereby validated Mr Ghosh, is yet to be looked into, though what makes matters even more unpalatable, is that Blackman is a member of the Department of Communities and Local Government (DCLG) committee. One of the functions of DCLG is to ensure the integration of communities and to ensure that British values of tolerance are protected, maintained and built upon. How Blackman, who sits on this Committee, could not be aware of Ghosh’s anti-Muslim hatred, is deeply concerning. For example, Ghosh has spoken about controlling the birth rate of Muslims, praised the genocide of the Rohingya Muslims in Myanmar and even suggested that Muslims should be forced to leave their religion if they come to a western country. Simply put, would the latter view then apply to other faiths or just to Muslims? It is pretty clear that Mr Ghosh was the ‘intolerant’ in an event called, ‘Tolerating the Intolerant’.

Mr Ghosh’s militancy based on his skewed views of Muslims also extended to the creation of a ‘Hindu Defence Force’ which he allegedly set up in response to ‘Muslim violence’. In a Twitter post that the Times reported on, Ghosh even stated that,

“Backwardness is the most powerful ‘weapon’ of Islam. Rohingyas are glaring example.”

This is who Bob Blackman MP hosted and in doing so,  legitimised.

What Do We Call For?

We are calling for the following:

  • That Parliament’s Sergeant-at-Arms open up a formal investigation into how Ghosh came to be in Parliament and that some serious questions be asked of Bob Blackman MP. The investigation should then be published as a learning tool for other MP’s.
  • That Blackman be removed from the DCLG Committee that he sits on, until he can explain his actions and apologise for hosting an anti-Muslim extremist in our country’s Parliament.
  • That all MP’s and their offices receive a notice from the Sergeant-at-Arms regarding undertaking due diligence checks on speakers whom they invite in.
  • That Blackman contact us and meet with a Rohingya refugee, to listen first hand at the appalling genocide that has been conducted against this defenceless people by Burma’s military junta, which itself has been legitimised by Aung Saan Su Kyi.

We leave you with this thought. Just imagine if an Islamist extremist had been hosted in Parliament by an MP. Today’s newspapers would, rightly, splash the story all over their front pages. Exactly how is this different?