Customize Consent Preferences

We use cookies to help you navigate efficiently and perform certain functions. You will find detailed information about all cookies under each consent category below.

The cookies that are categorized as "Necessary" are stored on your browser as they are essential for enabling the basic functionalities of the site. ... 

Always Active

Necessary cookies are required to enable the basic features of this site, such as providing secure log-in or adjusting your consent preferences. These cookies do not store any personally identifiable data.

No cookies to display.

Functional cookies help perform certain functionalities like sharing the content of the website on social media platforms, collecting feedback, and other third-party features.

No cookies to display.

Analytical cookies are used to understand how visitors interact with the website. These cookies help provide information on metrics such as the number of visitors, bounce rate, traffic source, etc.

No cookies to display.

Performance cookies are used to understand and analyze the key performance indexes of the website which helps in delivering a better user experience for the visitors.

No cookies to display.

Advertisement cookies are used to provide visitors with customized advertisements based on the pages you visited previously and to analyze the effectiveness of the ad campaigns.

No cookies to display.

Over the last 3 years we have systematically showed that the on-line world and social media present significant challenges to those working on tackling anti-Muslim hatred. The challenge is not only significant, it certainly changes fast as language and actions are affected by local, national or international incidents.

Yet, what is deeply concerning is when the actions of perpetrators are openly supported by people who decide to post their bigoted thoughts on Facebook pages, as some did on the Daily Mirror’s Facebook page yesterday.  The following post was placed onto the Daily Mirror’s Facebook page:

Mirror article

These are just some of the tens of responses that glorify the actions of the perpetrator who tried to pull of a woman’s Hijab and who shouted abuse at her on a train. In fact, once again, comments made on the Facebook page associate ‘Muslim men’ alone with grooming and perceptions after national scandals like the Rotherham grooming scandal continue to strongly affect community relations.

Lee Whitehead, (1970) said:

Lee Whitehead

Kathleen Wilson said:

Kathleen Wilson

Marc Ermisz from Paignton said:

Marc Ermisz

Tim Hale said:

Tiim Hale

Lee Marshall, (who seems to like taking selfies) said:

Lee Marshall

Frederick Harris from Mostyn said:

Frederick Harris

The question here, ladies and gentlemen, is how some people, like those named here, think that the ‘problem’ is with the victim and not the perpetrator. How can individuals make such statements against the victim, just because of her visible faith and her Hijab.

If we are to truly tackle all forms of hate, then challenging anti-Muslim hate also needs consistent work, yet practitioners who do this are sometimes threatened, have malicious blogs written about them and are themselves targeted by those who seek to legitimise their hate and bigotry. Collectively, we need to stand against such people and to protect some core values that are part of our country’s heritage. These include living free from fear and ensuring that no community is targeted because of their identities. On these core values, there should be no compromise.